By David C. Leach
An old joke begins by asking that you imagine a man drowning 100 feet offshore while a conservative and a liberal are observing. The conservative throws him a 50 foot rope and says: “swim the extra distance, it’s good for you.” The liberal, on the other hand, throws him a 100 foot line and then promptly drops his end of the line in order to go and do another good deed.
While offering insight into our politics the story also illuminates some of our habits around caregiving in our current healthcare system and the policies supporting that system. Certainly individual stories of near heroic caring can be found, but the system itself is designed around processes and structures that seem to diminish the importance of the caring relationships at the heart of our work. Caregivers frequently depend on work arounds. What would it take to develop a system that respects, rewards, or at least enables genuine caregiving?
Caregiving, of course, is an attribute of humans, not systems. To care for another requires a voluntary opening of the heart to compassion; it requires noticing and acknowledging the uniqueness of the other and a willingness to enter into their context. Keenan defines mercy as the willingness to enter into the chaos of the other. (1) The biblical story of the Good Samaritan (Luke, 10:33) illuminates an interesting attribute of caregiving that may indicate why humans can care and systems cannot; the clue is in the voice of the verbs used. The story is well known: a traveler has been assaulted and robbed.
The views, opinions and positions expressed by these authors and blogs are theirs and do not necessarily represent that of the Bioethics Research Library and Kennedy Institute of Ethics or Georgetown University.