Surrogate mother and clients of Men Having Babies
Surrogacy agencies are often accused of being unethical, but some do try set down ethical standards for their work. The American company Men Having Babies has posted a long statement of its ethical standards and aspirations on its website. Here are some of the principles:
- Surrogacy should be legal everywhere for infertile couples
- Contracts should be legally enforceable
- It should be possible to “seamlessly terminate any parental rights and obligations of donors and surrogates”
- Prospective parents should agree to criminal background checks
- Compensation should be reasonable. It should not be tied to outcomes.
- Surrogates should give informed consent and should have legal representation.
- “agencies need to ensure that at the very least, the surrogate has the right to see and hold the child she carried after the deliver”
Men Having Babies runs seminars in the United States, Belgium and Israel. A Belgian blogger attended a recent gathering in Brussels. She was skeptical of the ethical framework:
They claimed to be a non-profit organization aiming to provide tools and means for gay men to pursue their right to have a biological family. The fact that their biggest sponsors happened to be those fertility centers and law firms that pitched to the 220 attendees wasn’t considered as a conflict of interest to them …
Strongly advising to use the eggs from another woman than the surrogate, the birth mother is most likely to give up the baby. But also the enforceability of the 50-page contract offers the insurance that you can take the child with you after it is born.
The views, opinions and positions expressed by these authors and blogs are theirs and do not necessarily represent that of the Bioethics Research Library and Kennedy Institute of Ethics or Georgetown University.