Here’s a little amusement for the weekend, from a friend who lives in the States:
I received a state of the arts cardio monitor, per a prescription from a cardiologist, to determine if I have an irregular heart beat. All chrome and aluminium and clean and small with various electronic devices to transmit “information” to the company. 40 pages of instructions for the phone-like device. At one point the book (and the device) instruct me (i.e., tell me, not ask me) to push YES regarding company’s use of my information for research. I push NO.
Device will not allow diagnostic testing.
Doctor upset I won’t allow use of info.
I didn’t care UNTIL they told me I can’t use this device UNLESS I consent to use of the information for research. Now they are scrambling to ‘override’ the yes-only option, if possible.
I have to admit that, from a professional point of view, that’s kind of brilliant. And I suppose that it is consent, in a Hobson’s choice kind of a way.
The views, opinions and positions expressed by these authors and blogs are theirs and do not necessarily represent that of the Bioethics Research Library and Kennedy Institute of Ethics or Georgetown University.