A few weeks ago, I summarized the recent holding of the Alameda County Superior Court in CANHR v. Chapman.
This is a significant decision that materially impacts how treatment decisions are made for incapacitated patients without available authorized surrogates.
Karl Steinberg just wrote a powerful and scathing criticism of the final order. “I fear that the amount of personal suffering that will occur as the result of this ill-advised decision will be much worse than we can currently envision, but I hope I am wrong.”
The views, opinions and positions expressed by these authors and blogs are theirs and do not necessarily represent that of the Bioethics Research Library and Kennedy Institute of Ethics or Georgetown University.