The patient has been determined dead by neurological criteria (brain dead). While this has been explained to the family, they reject the diagnosis. Even after an independent second opinion, they still reject the diagnosis. They ask, “Isn’t there anything else we can do?”
Do you have any obligation to inform this family of the option to transfer?
1. This question is worth asking because such transfers are apparently actually possible (even if unlikely). Jahi McMath was transferred to a willing facility. Jesse Koochin was transferred. Theresa Hamilton was transferred. Other brain dead individuals were also transferred.
2. The duty of “reasonable accommodation” in California, Illinois, and New York might require offering the opportunity to find a transfer.
3. In other states, offering an opportunity to transfer is normally required in analogous treatment disputes (e.g. futility conflicts). Just because the current treating facility is unwilling to provide requested treatment does not mean that no other facility will do it. The transfer waiting period built into most state healthcare decisions statutes recognizes this variability.
3. But these transfer provisions do not directly apply to the brain death dispute, because the individual is no longer a patient. And the requested physiological intervention is not “life-sustaining treatment” or even “health care.”
4. There is no duty to inform the family of the option to transfer under the doctrine of informed consent. That is a malpractice duty and it ends with the death of the patient.
5. So, outside CA, IL, and NY, what is the legal duty to inform and facilitate a transfer?
The views, opinions and positions expressed by these authors and blogs are theirs and do not necessarily represent that of the Bioethics Research Library and Kennedy Institute of Ethics or Georgetown University.