… and they go and screw it up.
A few weeks (months?) ago, I got a call from Cosmopolitan to ask if I’d talk about home-testing kits for genetics – stuff like what 23andMe offers. We talked, and I like to think that I said something useful… and promptly forgot all about it, until just now, when the University of Manchester press office sent me a link to this: a story about HIV self-testing kits in the UK.
It’s a piece that quotes me. It quotes me from that interview I did about genetic – genetic! – tests:
Iain Brassington, Healthcare Ethics professor at the University of Manchester told Cosmo Body:
“People invest a lot in genetic information and it could have a serious psychological impact. Someone could feel anxious, distraught, even suicidal if they find out they are carrying a gene associated with particular diseases.”
Can you see the problem here?
Apart from the fact that I’m not, and am unlikely soon to be, a Professor, I mean?
OK: for clarity’s sake (and just in case there are any Cosmo readers who’ve drifted here): genetic tests and HIV tests are VERY DIFFERENT THINGS, and raise CORRESPONDINGLY DIFFERENT PROBLEMS. I don’t think that HIV is a genetic condition. Only idiots think that. Some of the problems with one might well be problems with the other. But we can’t leap between the two so easily. I don’t know what I think about home HIV tests; I’ve not thought about them much, and noone’s asked me to have an opionion on them yet.
The views, opinions and positions expressed by these authors and blogs are theirs and do not necessarily represent that of the Bioethics Research Library and Kennedy Institute of Ethics or Georgetown University.