This is just a quickie – I promise.
A tweet this morning from Kevin Yuill raises what he sees as a scary prospect:
The Falconer bill will treble suicides amongst the terminally ill, according to Dignity in Dying. Is that what we want? Reject this bill.
He bases his claim on two things, both from Dignity in Dying: first, this document, which estimates that 332 of the 4513 suicides in the England in 2012 (p 1); second, this document, which estimates that there would be 1000 assisted deaths in England and Wales under an Oregon-like law (p 10).
Dignity in Dying has disputed his interpretation of the figures, and I’ve spotted a couple of problems with them. Some of those who committed suicide while terminally ill may not have committed suicide because they were terminally ill; that might skew the figures. So might the leap from “England” to “England and Wales”. And, most importantly, we don’t know how many people would have killed themselves but for the current legal setup. (Neither does DiD.) Hence the trebling rate is at best an educated guess, but probably not even that.
But I’m going to allow that Yuill’s interpretation is reasonable for the sake of the argument. I’ll also allow – in keeping with the Falconer Bill – that all legal assisted deaths in the UK would be assisted suicides, rather than allocides. It occurs to me, though, that his claim still doesn’t do quite what he thinks it does, or wants it to do. Importantly, he assumes that an increase in suicides would be a bad thing – and that DiD has therefore blundered in admitting that the rate would rise.
The views, opinions and positions expressed by these authors and blogs are theirs and do not necessarily represent that of the Bioethics Research Library and Kennedy Institute of Ethics or Georgetown University.